This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] strfmon_l: Use specified locale for number formatting [BZ #19633]
- From: Stefan Liebler <stli at linux dot vnet dot ibm dot com>
- To: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:26:48 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] strfmon_l: Use specified locale for number formatting [BZ #19633]
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <56CF62D0 dot 8060803 at redhat dot com> <56CF7D30 dot 2090000 at redhat dot com> <56DD80AF dot 3000408 at redhat dot com> <56DD9E1C dot 5030408 at redhat dot com> <56DDA516 dot 4090509 at redhat dot com> <56DDB33A dot 1000405 at redhat dot com> <56DDDF0D dot 8040601 at redhat dot com> <56FBBDE3 dot 2050106 at redhat dot com> <56FBEBED dot 6050206 at gmail dot com> <57027826 dot 4000308 at redhat dot com>
On 04/04/2016 04:20 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/30/2016 05:08 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 03/30/2016 05:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/07/2016 09:05 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/07/2016 05:58 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
On 03/07/2016 10:58 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 03/07/2016 04:28 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
I tend to agree with Martin here, having that separation between
test and data makes it easier to read and change the test or add
more tests.
If you're getting a warning from the compiler you expect but don't
care about then you can just silence the warning with the appropriate
attribute?
The warning is not enabled by default (or even -W), so I'm not sure if
that's even necessary.
If the warning isn't enabled, then we don't need to worry about it
today.
The vision here is that we can run everything with -Werror, but we
aren't
there yet in some cases (see -Wundef fixes required).
Okay, here is a table-based version of the test. Other parts of the
patch are unchanged.
Ping?
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-03/msg00176.html
I like it.
Thanks, committed.
Florian
Hi,
on s390, i get elf/check-abi-libc.out:
--- ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/s390/s390-64/libc.abilist
2016-03-04 14:08:24.443047376 +0100
+++ /home/stli/glibcDir/glibc-20160405-build/libc.symlist
2016-04-05 08:34:18.215255347 +0200
@@ -2131,0 +2132 @@ GLIBC_2.4 __printf_fp F
+GLIBC_2.4 __printf_fp_l F
In stdio-common/printf_fp.c ldbl_-macros are used for __printf_fp_l ...:
ldbl_hidden_def (___printf_fp_l, __printf_fp_l)
ldbl_strong_alias (___printf_fp_l, __printf_fp_l)
... which are defined in sysdeps/generic/math_ldbl_opt.h
(e.g. used on x86_64):
#define ldbl_hidden_def(local, name) libc_hidden_def (name)
#define ldbl_strong_alias(name, aliasname) strong_alias (name, aliasname)
... or sysdeps/ieee754/ldbl-opt/math_ldbl_opt.h
(e.g used on s390):
#ifdef SHARED
# define ldbl_hidden_def(local, name) libc_hidden_ver (local, name)
# define ldbl_strong_alias(name, aliasname) \
strong_alias (name, __GL_##name##_##aliasname) \
long_double_symbol (libc, __GL_##name##_##aliasname, aliasname);
The attached patch uses the libc_hidden_def and strong_alias instead of
ldbl_hidden_def and ldbl_strong_alias macros.
Then, the testsuite is clean on x86_64 and s390.
Please verify.
ChangeLog:
2016-04-05 Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
* stdio-common/printf_fp.c (__printf_fp_l):
Use libc_hidden_def and strong_alias instead of
ldbl_hidden_def and ldbl_strong_alias macros.
diff --git a/stdio-common/printf_fp.c b/stdio-common/printf_fp.c
index baada9e..fb2a763 100644
--- a/stdio-common/printf_fp.c
+++ b/stdio-common/printf_fp.c
@@ -1248,8 +1248,8 @@ ___printf_fp_l (FILE *fp, locale_t loc,
}
return done;
}
-ldbl_hidden_def (___printf_fp_l, __printf_fp_l)
-ldbl_strong_alias (___printf_fp_l, __printf_fp_l)
+libc_hidden_def (__printf_fp_l)
+strong_alias (___printf_fp_l, __printf_fp_l)
int
___printf_fp (FILE *fp, const struct printf_info *info,