This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 17 Mar 2016 19:41, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > the smooth transition plan is for tirpc to provide the full API. if > > tirpc should do this. At least I'm not aware about any missing ones. i've posted in the past (years ago at this point) about some of the parts libtirpc was missing. > > > glibc turns off the exported symbols (which --disable-obsolete-rpc > > > does), then there is no "smooth" transition -- your code fails to link > > > entirely if you aren't supporting tirpc. stub headers do not make it > > > any easier ... if anything, it makes it harder. > > The problem is, that glibc neither fully disables rpc nor > that the NSS functionality can be provided by third party > implementation. > But as long as you refuse to dicuss any realistic solution > to solve this, nothing will change. i have no idea what you're talking about. i've already stated a realistic solution: glibc shouldn't install any rpc/ headers when it's disabled as all headers/symbols are provided by libtirpc. you on the other hand have not said why that's a problem. vague references to "it's not a smooth transition" makes no sense as i already said. -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |