This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Enable demuxed sysv IPC syscalls


"Paul E. Murphy" <murphyp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:

> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgctl.c b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgctl.c
> index a24dc38..86f34a2 100644
> --- a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgctl.c
> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/msgctl.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,11 @@ int
>  attribute_compat_text_section
>  __old_msgctl (int msqid, int cmd, struct __old_msqid_ds *buf)
>  {
> +#ifdef __ASSUME_MSGCTL_SYSCALL
> +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (msgctl, 3, msqid, cmd, buf);
> +#else
>    return INLINE_SYSCALL (ipc, 5, IPCOP_msgctl, msqid, cmd, 0, buf);
> +#endif
>  }
>  compat_symbol (libc, __old_msgctl, msgctl, GLIBC_2_0);

There should be no need for a compat code to use a new syscall.

>  #endif
> @@ -64,7 +68,12 @@ compat_symbol (libc, __old_msgctl, msgctl, GLIBC_2_0);
>  int
>  __new_msgctl (int msqid, int cmd, struct msqid_ds *buf)
>  {
> +#ifdef __ASSUME_MSGCTL_SYSCALL
> +  return INLINE_SYSCALL (msgctl, 3, msqid, cmd | __IPC_64, buf);

Why does a brand new syscall need IPC_64?

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]