This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Remove signal handling for nanosleep (bug 16364)
- From: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org>
- To: Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: libc-alpha at sourceware dot org, Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:54:28 -0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Remove signal handling for nanosleep (bug 16364)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1447160038-11754-1-git-send-email-adhemerval dot zanella at linaro dot org> <mvmy4e6yoxv dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <5641F136 dot 9030204 at linaro dot org> <mvmtwouylw0 dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <56422DD1 dot 3070406 at redhat dot com> <5643379F dot 3020604 at linaro dot org> <564B34F2 dot 40204 at linaro dot org> <564B374F dot 3090901 at redhat dot com>
On 17-11-2015 12:18, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/17/2015 03:08 PM, Adhemerval Zanella wrote:
>
>> It appears this discussion has been stalled and to move forward at least
>> with the patch core discussion (nanosleep refactor), I would like to
>> continue discuss solely the code modification at its third version [1].
>>
>> I will send another patch with the only the testcase and then we can
>> continue discuss if it worth or not to include possible racy testcase
>> in GLIBC.
>>
>> [1] https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-11/msg00206.html
>
> I have no objections to this patch as a first step. (“Remove file” in
> changelog should be followed by a “.”.)
Thanks, I will push the patch and resend the testcase.
>
> Thanks,
> Florian
>