This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Archive rebuild to test potential stdlib.h / sys/types.h changes in glibc 2.23
- From: Zack Weinberg <zackw at panix dot com>
- To: Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>
- Cc: debian-qa at lists dot debian dot org, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 12:36:31 -0500
- Subject: Re: Archive rebuild to test potential stdlib.h / sys/types.h changes in glibc 2.23
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5648F6EC dot 9060207 at panix dot com> <mvmsi46ui0s dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de> <CAKCAbMg5x9p5tx5pKgvN4QbUNoMwEOdZyn8W2pTkVu+QYNWmXg at mail dot gmail dot com> <mvmoaeuufez dot fsf at hawking dot suse dot de>
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:34 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> writes:
>>
>> ... should only be possible as a consequence of the patch numbered 0002-.
>
> Which is the first patch.
It's not terribly important, but what ordering are you using to define
it as the "first patch"?
> ./src/basic/strbuf.h:52:1: error: unknown type name 'ssize_t'
> hugetests.h:50:1: error: unknown type name 'ino_t'
> src/fsck.fat.h:138:5: error: unknown type name 'loff_t'
It's starting to sound like lots of programs assume stdlib.h pulls in
sys/types.h...
zw