This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 1:43 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Szabolcs Nagy <nsz@port70.net> wrote: >> >> * H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> [2015-11-07 06:55:02 -0800]: >> >>> This test applies to i386 and x86_64 which set R_386_GLOB_DAT and >> >>> R_X86_64_GLOB_DAT to ELF_RTYPE_CLASS_EXTERN_PROTECTED_DATA. OK for >> >>> master? >> >>> >> >> >> >> why is the test x86 specific? >> >> >> >> extern protected data handling and LD_TRACE_PRELINKING >> >> seem to be generic. >> > >> > It only applies to GLOB_DAT relocation. Not all targets have it >> > and I have only x86 to test. >> > >> >> I will check it in and backport the fix with this this to 2.22 branch. > > I see no sign of consensus for an x86-specific test here. I too think the > test should be written in an architecture-independent way, with a way for > architectures for which it is inapplicable to disable it. Here is a patch to run it on targets with GLOB_DAT reloc. -- H.J.
Attachment:
git.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |