This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Should glibc provide a builtin C.UTF-8 locale?
- From: Rich Felker <dalias at libc dot org>
- To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 11:13:22 -0400
- Subject: Re: Should glibc provide a builtin C.UTF-8 locale?
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <54DB8243 dot 3050903 at redhat dot com> <20151021174936 dot GA26317 at vapier dot lan>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 01:49:36PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> i've created a C.UTF-8 page where i've tried to gather all the points
> people made in this thread:
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Proposals/C.UTF-8
On the wiki I see, under differences from C:
- LC_COLLATE: Sort using the Unicode codepoint
But this does not seem to be a difference. Unicode codepoint order is
identical to UTF-8 code unit order as unsigned char, i.e. the same as
the C locale.
Rich