This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: glibc 2.21 - Machine maintainers, please test your machines.


On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-01-23 at 16:22 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 4:11 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> wrote:
>> >> On 1/23/2015 5:03 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Dear Machine Maintainers,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please start testing your machines against glibc
>> >>>> master.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please update the glibc 2.21 release page with your
>> >>>> testing results:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Release/2.21
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If nobody objects I want to cut the release as soon
>> >>>
>> >>> x32 failed to build:
>> >>>
>> >>> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17870
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> tilegx32 failed to build with the same symptoms.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I checked in my fix.  It should build for you now.
>> >
>>
>> I checked in another fix.
>
> HJ, a fix for this was posted on Thursday already, and you had been CC'd
> on it and replied.  Please check that there's no difference between what
> you patched and the proposed patch.  (It's wait too late in my timezone
> to do that now, but I'll do this tomorrow or so too.)
>

I checked:

https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2015-01/msg00421.html

My patches are equivalent to yours.


-- 
H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]