This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- From: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>
- To: Andrew Senkevich <andrew dot n dot senkevich at gmail dot com>
- Cc: libc-alpha <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 20:15:00 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PING] [PATCH] x86_32: memcpy, mempcpy, memmove, memcpy_chk, mempcpy_chk, memmove_chk optimized with SSE2 unaligned loads/stores
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAMXFM3u6ffGkx5UtVPZwLRzpSh8JfsV2Y1+SK3i+d7Vv45dFuw at mail dot gmail dot com>
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 02:56:10PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it is ping for patch which was discussed at the beginning of august,
> end of discussion is
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2014-08/msg00078.html
>
> Is it Ok for trunk?
>
It looked OK for me performancewise. I planned to check that for bugs
which is still in my TODO list. If somebody else checked that it would
be ok to commit.