This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: C11 threads ABI questions - enum values
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch at lst dot de>
- To: Rich Felker <dalias at libc dot org>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, Roland McGrath <roland at hack dot frob dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 20:39:10 +0200
- Subject: Re: C11 threads ABI questions - enum values
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141001211308 dot 88F742C397E at topped-with-meat dot com> <20141001211606 dot GN23797 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <20141001213022 dot 798942C3AAD at topped-with-meat dot com> <20141002001720 dot GO23797 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <20141002214229 dot 734B62C3A2F at topped-with-meat dot com> <20141002222958 dot GR23797 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410031038300 dot 26280 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20141003151917 dot GS23797 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1410031527460 dot 14538 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <20141003153248 dot GT23797 at brightrain dot aerifal dot cx>
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 11:32:48AM -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> Indeed, they need to be reserved on the kernel side, and during the
> discussion on linux-api, almost everybody seemed to be failing to
> understand why this is needed... :(
At least of O_SEARCH and O_EXEC I strongly disagreed with the idea that
they should be implementated in userspace and still do.