This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Added icmp6 options and router preference
- From: Dan LÃdtke <mail at danrl dot de>
- To: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Cc: OndÅej BÃlka <neleai at seznam dot cz>, Florian Weimer <fweimer at redhat dot com>, Dan Luedtke <danrl at danrl dot de>
- Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2014 18:08:13 +0200
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added icmp6 options and router preference
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <1392240598-7113-1-git-send-email-danrl at danrl dot de> <53563C70 dot 7090202 at redhat dot com> <20140422102116 dot GA10345 at domone> <11181094 dot 1H22bvhXK7 at vapier>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi guys,
Please merge! I claim no copyright whatsoever. This is all public RFC
I just translated into C. These changes are needed! The software using
the changes is already in the Fedora repos with a workaround.
https://github.com/danrl/ratools/blob/master/src/ratools.h#L30
Cheers
Dan
On 08/02/2014 05:29 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue 22 Apr 2014 12:21:16 OndÅej BÃlka wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:54:56AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> On 03/31/2014 12:01 PM, Dan Luedtke wrote:
>>>> Hi Florian, OndÅej, @list,
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 09:18 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>> There is precedent for ND_OPT_ARO instead.
>>>>
>>>> I am fine with that! Looks better that the long version.
>>>
>>> It doesn't seem like this was applied. Do we need copyright
>>> assignment for a change with such limited scope?
>>
>> I asked if you have additional comments, you could commit it if
>> you want.
>>
>> Typically copyrigth assignment is not needed when total changes
>> of person are below 15 lines.
>
> well, the diffstat shows that it's more than 2x the number you
> stated
>
> but the "small line count" is really a simplified rule of thumb for
> the idea that copyright assignment papers are not required when the
> change is not deemed copyrightable. i think this is such a case as
> it's merely adding defines for existing standards to a public API
> header.
>
> so if everyone is happy, shall we merge ? -mike
>
- --
Dan LÃdtke
https://www.danrl.de/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
iF4EAREIAAYFAlPdDO0ACgkQg7qmx/JyvfyaqAD8CirilfStPMpX5a38LK+HmD8G
Qgtb5IyR6rR0O6nMfqIBAJw4bbiVZdr+Mua7GfuhqKziXllBvbEETVsPmQXn7Gyx
=O112
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----