This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue 22 Apr 2014 12:21:16 OndÅej BÃlka wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:54:56AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > On 03/31/2014 12:01 PM, Dan Luedtke wrote: > > >Hi Florian, OndÅej, @list, > > > > > >On Mon, 2014-03-31 at 09:18 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >>There is precedent for ND_OPT_ARO instead. > > > > > >I am fine with that! Looks better that the long version. > > > > It doesn't seem like this was applied. Do we need copyright > > assignment for a change with such limited scope? > > I asked if you have additional comments, you could commit it if you > want. > > Typically copyrigth assignment is not needed when total changes > of person are below 15 lines. well, the diffstat shows that it's more than 2x the number you stated but the "small line count" is really a simplified rule of thumb for the idea that copyright assignment papers are not required when the change is not deemed copyrightable. i think this is such a case as it's merely adding defines for existing standards to a public API header. so if everyone is happy, shall we merge ? -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |