This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Consensus on MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs.
- From: Torvald Riegel <triegel at redhat dot com>
- To: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at redhat dot com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha at sourceware dot org>, Rich Felker <dalias at aerifal dot cx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2013 18:52:17 +0100
- Subject: Re: Consensus on MT-, AS- and AC-Safety docs.
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <528A7C8F dot 8060805 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311182312130 dot 8831 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <528BA2DA dot 3090608 at redhat dot com> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311192205550 dot 8742 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <ortxf6tcpk dot fsf at livre dot home> <Pine dot LNX dot 4 dot 64 dot 1311211304050 dot 14539 at digraph dot polyomino dot org dot uk> <orzjoxro50 dot fsf at livre dot home> <1385159850 dot 3152 dot 2815 dot camel at triegel dot csb> <orwqjzqnic dot fsf at livre dot home>
On Sat, 2013-11-23 at 11:02 -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2013, Torvald Riegel <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Thus, it will be in the context of full English sentences
> Actually, no; the context of the keywords is supposed to be a one-line
> âtableâ already containing such abbreviated English words as MT-Safe and
> AC-Unsafe. It's not running text in any way you look at it.
I was referring to the documentation that even the one-line "table"
would be part of. Which is mostly full English sentences, right?