This is the mail archive of the libc-alpha@sourceware.org mailing list for the glibc project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: iconvdata regression

From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 18:03:59 -0400

> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:32 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
>> Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:28:04 -0400
>>
>>> Dave, do you have an opinion here?
>>
>> Since the revert is easy folks to do locally, I suppose it's not that
>> big of a deal if it will be addressed properly on Monday.
> 
> Do we agree that build breakage is *much* more serious since it
> impacts reg testing?

This iconvdata regression one effected reg testing too, I don't see
what the difference might be.

A build regression introducing change could potentially just as easily
be isolated and reverted in the developer's local sources, right?
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]