This is the mail archive of the
libc-alpha@sourceware.org
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: [PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible struct members
- From: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos at systemhalted dot org>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: Guillem Jover <guillem at hadrons dot org>, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at gmail dot com>, libc-alpha at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 09:39:19 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible struct members
- References: <20120102030627.GA10869@gaara.hadrons.org><CAOPLpQf_kr1EOguKau_co9Q96tgRNBDwfO6CBNF7jnnSrzEPvA@mail.gmail.com><CADZpyixstsdjeQaJ6WAU4rnY8dGMUi_wgzYCuPxU0uRXxCcSVA@mail.gmail.com><CAOPLpQdnHQ5ezbohKQgRAnofSureJQtcjKiEsNBWVsA5nr9zsA@mail.gmail.com><CADZpyiw7q1bTKb6wNNDbZhbwFKg36oE8+m8M+VtevGzt3JtRfA@mail.gmail.com><CAOPLpQeYL6LAqUu3GQzzK7fcVc7gApKJB6Y5AmKK=mu3m4nbFQ@mail.gmail.com><20120207222700.GA4131@gaara.hadrons.org><Pine.LNX.4.64.1202072239170.4538@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> This is probably my last mail on this issue, as it does not seem to be
>> going anywhere. Thanks Carlos for your perseverance, though!
>
> Actually, I think a rough consensus was reached: establish a convention
> __glibc_reservedN for padding fields and rename them all. ?See
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-02/msg00051.html> and followups.
Joseph,
I agree, I think using __glibc_ prefix is the best way to avoid
overlap of the identifiers.
Guillem,
Do you have time to publish another patch using the __glibc_ prefix?
Cheers,
Carlos.