This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the glibc project.
Re: Latest Glibc from CVS has segmentation problems.
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Oh chirst, this isn't about who is working for who.
> Actually, it might be. Who can say for certain whether the current
> situation is the result of incompetence or conflict of interest?
> But true, this is not the main point.
> I do not see any "current situation" other then a bunch of people
> flaming to their hearts contents (this includes me).
I thought the "current situation" was obvious. From your statement of
blind ignorance, I guess not. To clarify what I meant:
1) No release of glibc, not even a point release, in over a year.
2) A package maintainer who thinks only "distribution makers" and
not "random people" should compile his code.
> There is no "release often" rule when it comes to free software, the
> GNU project releases things when they are _stable_, not before.
The current "stable" release does not even compile.
And although "release often" is not a rule, it is one indication of a
job being done properly.
> I suggest that you start following the damn thread, it is not about
Read the thread yourself. My reply was to Ulrich's "random people"
comment, not to the original poster. I am speaking as a "random