This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on mingw
- From: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- To: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
- Cc: Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 16:32:01 -0600
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on mingw
- References: <CAPTJ0XHS3mhnBzUmN0X1wJZMH69V_aQQPH7Trxf9TnQMfgH0ng@mail.gmail.com> <20191218190705.161582-1-cbiesinger@google.com> <20200102113102.GA4137@adacore.com> <CAPTJ0XF91qwr6aFLZLrQ0shwws-0sCOOdr3sMyKQL-aS6zfWYQ@mail.gmail.com> <87zhewxo9s.fsf@tromey.com>
- Reply-to: Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger at google dot com>
On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 4:23 PM Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Christian" == Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>
> >> If my understanding is correct, then I am OK with this patch, and
> >> you can push it to both master and gdb-9-branch. Even if people
> >> object to the approach, this patch doesn't make it any more difficult
> >> to enhance the build to have fortify on by default.
>
> Christian> Let me know your thoughts on the above, especially the NEWS question.
>
> I think it is fine as-is, without a NEWS entry.
> Please check it in.
Thanks, pushed to master. OK for the gdb 9 branch too?
To ssh://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git
3061113bf3..5f23a08201 HEAD -> master
Christian