This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on mingw
- From: Tom Tromey <tom at tromey dot com>
- To: "Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Christian Biesinger <cbiesinger at google dot com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:23:27 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Don't define _FORTIFY_SOURCE on mingw
- References: <CAPTJ0XHS3mhnBzUmN0X1wJZMH69V_aQQPH7Trxf9TnQMfgH0ng@mail.gmail.com> <20191218190705.161582-1-cbiesinger@google.com> <20200102113102.GA4137@adacore.com> <CAPTJ0XF91qwr6aFLZLrQ0shwws-0sCOOdr3sMyKQL-aS6zfWYQ@mail.gmail.com>
>>>>> "Christian" == Christian Biesinger via gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
>> If my understanding is correct, then I am OK with this patch, and
>> you can push it to both master and gdb-9-branch. Even if people
>> object to the approach, this patch doesn't make it any more difficult
>> to enhance the build to have fortify on by default.
Christian> Let me know your thoughts on the above, especially the NEWS question.
I think it is fine as-is, without a NEWS entry.
Please check it in.
thanks,
Tom