This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA 2/2][master only] gdb/windows-nat.c: Get rid of main_thread_id global


> > Personally, I feel the other way, especially since we always get
> > all sorts of random temporary thread notifications polutting the
> > output, that I don't mind the extra notification. And that way,
> > I know when each thread is actually terminated, and with what
> > error code.
> > 
> > But if you and others feel differently, I can switch my approach:
> > 
> >   - patch #1 (master+8.3): Just fix the crash, and nothing more.
> > 
> >         This means that, on 8.3, thread creation and exit notifications
> >         can be slightly off; this is considered an acceptable known
> >         problem, and is not a regression.
> > 
> >         This is actually what we've put in AdaCore's GDB as a first
> >         step to see we had any issue after that, and we did not.
> > 
> >   - patch #2 (master only): Remove uses of the global
> > 
> >         But we keep the filtering of the "main" thread. We still
> >         the known problem that the thread-exit notifications might
> >         be silenced for the wrong thread. Not a regression.
> > 
> >   - patch #3 (master only): Tag the main thread, and silence
> >     the thread-exit notification of the thread that got tagged.
> >     Depending on the implementation, this patch would potentially
> >     be acceptable for 8.3, but might need extra work to apply.
> >     I think we've had enough problems with 8.3 as it is, I don't
> >     want to add more things to do, so I vote OUT for 8.3.
> > 
> > I don't think I have time for that before the weekend or next week,
> > though.
> 
> Mine is just one opinion.  I think we should solicit opinions from
> others before you invest all that effort.  If I'm the only one who is
> bothered by your original proposal, I think you should go ahead and
> push it.

Since I think you use the debugger on Windows more than I personally do,
I'll go the other way. Unless someone else tips the balance the other way,
I'll go with your opinion over mine ;-).

-- 
Joel


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]