This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] Documentation for the remove-symbol-file command.
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: "Blanc, Nicolas" <nicolas dot blanc at intel dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, lgustavo at codesourcery dot com
- Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:04:04 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/5] Documentation for the remove-symbol-file command.
- References: <1372062967-28510-1-git-send-email-nicolas dot blanc at intel dot com> <1372062967-28510-4-git-send-email-nicolas dot blanc at intel dot com> <83mwqfjxej dot fsf at gnu dot org> <388084C8C1E6A64FA36AD1D656E485661A7A6C32 at IRSMSX106 dot ger dot corp dot intel dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: "Blanc, Nicolas" <nicolas.blanc@intel.com>
> CC: "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,
> "lgustavo@codesourcery.com" <lgustavo@codesourcery.com>
> Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:13:35 +0000
>
>
> >> The symbol table of the file @var{filename} is added to the symbol
> >> table originally read with the @code{symbol-file} command. You can
> >> use the @code{add-symbol-file} command any number of times; the new
> >> symbol data -thus read keeps adding to the old. To discard all old
> >> symbol data -instead, use the @code{symbol-file} command without any arguments.
> >> +thus read keeps adding to the old.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > I guess you meant "is kept in addition to the old", right?
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> This sentence "the new symbol data thus read keeps adding to the old." is original.
> I removed the next one on the same line. "keeps adding" sounds ok
> to my ears but I am not a native speaker. So I'll follow your recommendation.
> Should I change the sentence?
Yes, please.