This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH, doc]: Rename Index node to prevent file collision
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: michael dot hope at linaro dot org
- Cc: brobecker at adacore dot com, joseph at codesourcery dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 22:55:22 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH, doc]: Rename Index node to prevent file collision
- References: <4FD94EC0.1000009@linaro.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1206141505070.24877@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <83ehphyhdn.fsf@gnu.org> <CANLjY-nrPVBk1RM7gOo4yhvzFd+agB9Xs=kUAMUJna0LP-voZQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120614220037.GO18729@adacore.com> <83txydf2nj.fsf@gnu.org> <CANLjY-kbm17+7O5cWYsR09u2dnMw_Y7f1ifweamXVFr3GF9Oiw@mail.gmail.com> <83lijle3fu.fsf@gnu.org> <CANLjY-mxLOu3+0ohZc-=N7vCDg2se-gGFzc5w8nUzZoWQ1M8oA@mail.gmail.com> <83ipekd496.fsf@gnu.org> <CANLjY-nMhcXBnACRoKeuaDf8HfA_a-hoLKyywrGc0jMbVksgeQ@mail.gmail.com> <83a9zvdh1g.fsf@gnu.org> <837guzd5q1.fsf@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Ping! Should I commit this?
> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:02:46 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> > Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 08:58:19 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> > Cc: brobecker@adacore.com, joseph@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> >
> > > >> > The problem with your suggestion is that the GDB index is not a
> > > >> > concept index, it is all the indices lumped into one. ?But I would be
> > > >> > OK if we separate the concept index from the rest, and then we could
> > > >> > have "Concept Index" and "Command and Variable Index".
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd rather not go there as it's a big change for little gain.
> > > >
> > > > ??? It's as simple as modifying the "@syncodeindex" directives at the
> > > > beginning of gdb.texinfo, and then adding 2 @node lines for the two
> > > > indices, instead of the current one. ?All the rest will be done by
> > > > makeinfo. ?Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > Sorry, I assumed that we'd have to check and perhaps update each index
> > > entry to see that it's in the right category.
> >
> > No. We already have separate index categories: see the @kindex,
> > @findex, @vindex, etc. directives, in addition to @cindex, that we
> > have all over the manual. It's just that these 4 directives at the
> > beginning of gdb.texinfo:
> >
> > @syncodeindex ky cp
> > @syncodeindex tp cp
> >
> > @c readline appendices use @vindex, @findex and @ftable,
> > @c annotate.texi and gdbmi use @findex.
> > @syncodeindex vr cp
> > @syncodeindex fn cp
> >
> > arrange for all of them to be lumped into a single index "cp" (which
> > stands for "Concept Index"), and so this directive in the single
> > "Index" node we have:
> >
> > @printindex cp
> >
> > prints all of the index entries together.
> >
> > > Your texinfo foo is better than mine - could you post a patch?
> >
> > OK.
>
> Here it is. Does this solve your problem?
>
>
> Index: gdb.texinfo
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/doc/gdb.texinfo,v
> retrieving revision 1.978
> diff -u -p -r1.978 gdb.texinfo
> --- gdb.texinfo 22 Jun 2012 08:37:49 -0000 1.978
> +++ gdb.texinfo 22 Jun 2012 10:01:35 -0000
> @@ -18,13 +18,17 @@
> @end iftex
>
> @finalout
> -@syncodeindex ky cp
> -@syncodeindex tp cp
> +@c To avoid file-name clashes between index.html and Index.html, when
> +@c the manual is produced on a Posix host and then moved to a
> +@c case-insensitive filesystem (e.g., MS-Windows), we separate the
> +@c indices into two: Concept Index and all the rest.
> +@syncodeindex ky fn
> +@syncodeindex tp fn
>
> @c readline appendices use @vindex, @findex and @ftable,
> @c annotate.texi and gdbmi use @findex.
> -@syncodeindex vr cp
> -@syncodeindex fn cp
> +@syncodeindex vr fn
> +@syncodeindex fn fn
>
> @c !!set GDB manual's edition---not the same as GDB version!
> @c This is updated by GNU Press.
> @@ -182,7 +186,9 @@ software in general. We will miss him.
> * Copying:: GNU General Public License says
> how you can copy and share GDB
> * GNU Free Documentation License:: The license for this documentation
> -* Index:: Index
> +* Concept Index:: Index of @value{GDBN} concepts
> +* Command and Variable Index:: Index of @value{GDBN} commands, variables,
> + functions, and Python data types
> @end menu
>
> @end ifnottex
> @@ -1780,8 +1786,9 @@ In addition to @code{help}, you can use
> and @code{show} to inquire about the state of your program, or the state
> of @value{GDBN} itself. Each command supports many topics of inquiry; this
> manual introduces each of them in the appropriate context. The listings
> -under @code{info} and under @code{show} in the Index point to
> -all the sub-commands. @xref{Index}.
> +under @code{info} and under @code{show} in the Command, Variable, and
> +Function Index point to all the sub-commands. @xref{Command and Variable
> +Index}.
>
> @c @group
> @table @code
> @@ -40415,11 +40422,16 @@ A string in the constant pool is zero-te
> @appendix GNU Free Documentation License
> @include fdl.texi
>
> -@node Index
> -@unnumbered Index
> +@node Concept Index
> +@unnumbered Concept Index
>
> @printindex cp
>
> +@node Command and Variable Index
> +@unnumbered Command, Variable, and Function Index
> +
> +@printindex fn
> +
> @tex
> % I think something like @@colophon should be in texinfo. In the
> % meantime:
>