This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : <phase_2_complete>
- From: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2011 00:27:28 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm reversible : <phase_2_complete>
- References: <998639.46560.qm@web112516.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3fwnusq4e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <321260.58442.qm@web112504.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3hb6rfc5j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1316327455.23344.YahooMailNeo@web112509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <1316404058.27177.YahooMailNeo@web112502.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <m3pqhzcowx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <1318650316.91503.YahooMailNeo@web112508.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4E9952EA.5040805@codesourcery.com> <m3pqh9rv2u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
On 11/04/2011 01:10 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com> writes:
>
> Yao> I noticed that test cases in gdb.reverse are *not* enabled in default.
>
> Do you know why that is? It seems to me that they should be enabled on
> platforms where they are known to work. The current situation means
> that any regressions are probably completely missed.
>
I don't know why, looks these cases are written in that way at the
beginning.
I have a sed script to convert "target_info exists gdb,use_precord" to a
proc "support_process_record" which returns true on x86-linux and
x86_64-linux. There are some fails running these tests in gdb.reverse
on x86-linux, IMO, we don't have to KFAIL them, because these fails are
unknown to us. I'll send out this patch later.
--
Yao (éå)