This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp

From: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
To: yao at codesourcery dot com
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 10:59:17 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
References: <4DC401D0.1050500@codesourcery.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1105061426440.8538@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> <4DC75036.4040806@codesourcery.com> <m3oc3bud5j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <4DD4A5DC.9060004@codesourcery.com> <4DD6238D.40501@codesourcery.com> <4DDB0DC6.9050200@codesourcery.com>

> Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 09:45:42 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> 
> This is the version 3 of patch 4/4.  In this version,
> setup_kfail_for_target is used to KFAIL the same fail to different PRs
> according to target triplet, same as what I did in patch 3/4.

Can't you fold this behaviour into the normal setup_kfail?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
  - From: Yao Qi

References:
- [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch, testsuite] Tests to _Complex type
  - From: Tom Tromey
- [_Complex test 4/4] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [_Complex test 4/4] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
  - From: Yao Qi
- [_Complex test 4/4 V3] _Complex tests in callfuncs.exp
  - From: Yao Qi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]