This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step
- From: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
- To: aristovski at qnx dot com (Aleksandar Ristovski)
- Cc: pedro at codesourcery dot com (Pedro Alves), brobecker at adacore dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 19:34:27 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [rfc v2][rft (procfs, nto-procfs)] Fix signal bypass heuristic with software single-step
Aleksandar Ristovski wrote:
> I tested your patch on self-hosted x86 Neutrino and it did not show any
> regressions.
Great! Thanks for your support.
> BTW, can you incorporate this in your patch to remove compile issues:
>
> @@ -72,9 +72,11 @@ static ptid_t do_attach (ptid_t ptid);
>
> static int procfs_can_use_hw_breakpoint (int, int, int);
>
> -static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_insert_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> -static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type);
> +static int procfs_remove_hw_watchpoint (CORE_ADDR addr, int len, int type,
> + struct expression *);
>
> static int procfs_stopped_by_watchpoint (void);
Sure; I've checked this part in right away.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU Toolchain for Linux on System z and Cell BE
Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com