This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [try 2nd, patch] Move common macros to i386-dbg-reg.h

> "a fully featured native GDB replacement or a lightweight remote
> protocol stub" is *not* related to this patch at all.  I am unable to do
> such choice.  This patch (and other patches of mine in this area) is to
> reduce source code duplication as much as possible.  No matter what
> model we choose for gdbserver, this patch still makes sense, IMO.

It does, but before we do so, I think it's important to know how
we are going to reduce this duplication. I haven't looked at the patch,
so I can't comment on it, but I think we just need a plan of what and
how we're going to avoid that.

-- 
Joel
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]