This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: partially fix empty DW_OP_piece

On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 21:05:36 +0200, Tom Tromey wrote:
> >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:
> 
> Tom> So, for VLA I would say that the bounds ought to be fixed at the time
> Tom> the snapshot is taken.  I suppose this would mean introducing some copy
> Tom> of the type.
> 
> Jan> That is interesting idea (and currently in the VLA patch it happens
> Jan> that way).  Still it is probably really needed only for the GDB
> Jan> values history.
> 
> Yeah, and Python.

OK, that probably means there really must remain a way to convert `inferior
dependent struct value' into an `inferior independent struct value'.


Thanks,
Jan
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]