Re: RFC: partially fix empty DW_OP_piece

[Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>]

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> So, for VLA I would say that the bounds ought to be fixed at the time
Tom> the snapshot is taken.  I suppose this would mean introducing some copy
Tom> of the type.

Jan> That is interesting idea (and currently in the VLA patch it happens
Jan> that way).  Still it is probably really needed only for the GDB
Jan> values history.

Yeah, and Python.

Jan> As we talked with Tom he has already the patch coded+working.  I
Jan> thought only a plan for his coding is being discussed now.
Jan> Therefore leaving the VLA design decision for a later point
Jan> unrelated to his current patch.

Ok.  I'm going to submit my patch in a minute.

Tom