This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)

From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 09:23:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)
References: <20100602143233.GA22447@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <201006021603.50479.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20100602161218.GA31980@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>

> > > +gdb_breakpoint "main"
> > > +gdb_run_cmd
> > > +gdb_test "" "" "start"

Would it be OK to use ".*" as the expected output?  This makes it
explicit that you expect some output, but just don't care what it is.
This is relative to a question that MichaelS asked, because he's working
on replacing uses of gdb_test where no output is expected.


-- 
Joel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]