This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bug in i386_process_record

I tried.  Everything is OK.

Thanks,
Hui

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:01, Hui Zhu<teawater@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 02:24, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>>> (gdb) FAIL: gdb.reverse/machinestate.exp: step
>>>
>>> I think the fail is because rs didn't step into hide.
>>
>> 32bit or 64?
>> If 64, did you try it after applying my two recent patches?
>>
>> Anyway, that is not the only reason it fails.
>> It fails for me on 32 bit intel.
>
> I try amd64 with your new patch in last night, everything is OK.
>
> For x86, I try it in prev some day, everything is OK too.
>
> This pc don't have the gdb-cvs-head and I cannot connect gdb cvs now.
> I will try it later.
>
> Thanks,
> Hui
>
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]