This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA/RFC Prec] Add Linux AMD64 process record support second version, (instruction set support) 1/3


Hi Mark,

Could you please help me review this patch?

Thanks,
Hui

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 06:00, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
> Hui Zhu wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 07:53, Michael Snyder<msnyder@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>>> Mark Kettenis should approve it, though.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks Michael.
>>
>> I update the patches according to your mail except changelog. ?Because
>> It sames that we just add * at the begin of the function name.
>>
>> Please help me review it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hui
>>
>> 2009-07-20 ?Hui Zhu ?<teawater@gmail.com>
>>
>> ? ? ? ?Add AMD64 process record instruction set support.
>>
>> ? ? ? ?* i386-tdep.h (gdbarch_tdep): Add record_regmap for registers
>> ? ? ? ?because the AMD64's registers order in GDB is not same with
>> ? ? ? ?I386 instructions.
>> ? ? ? ?Add i386_syscall_record to be the syscall function handle
>> ? ? ? ?interface.
>> ? ? ? ?(record_i386_regnum): Number for record_regmap.
>> ? ? ? ?* i386-tdep.c (OT_QUAD): For 64 bits.
>> ? ? ? ?(i386_record_s): Add rex_x, rex_b, rip_offset and
>> ? ? ? ?popl_esp_hack for AMD64 instruction set. And regmap for
>> ? ? ? ?record_regmap.
>> ? ? ? ?(i386_record_lea_modrm_addr): Support AMD64 instruction set
>> ? ? ? ?64 bits lea.
>> ? ? ? ?(i386_record_lea_modrm): Ditto.
>> ? ? ? ?(i386_record_push): New function. ?Record the execution log
>> ? ? ? ?of push.
>> ? ? ? ?(I386_RECORD_ARCH_LIST_ADD_REG): New macro to record the
>> ? ? ? ?register.
>> ? ? ? ?(i386_process_record): Support AMD64 instruction set.
>> ? ? ? ?amd64-tdep.c (amd64_record_regmap): For record_regmap.
>> ? ? ? ?(amd64_init_abi): Set amd64_record_regmap to record_regmap.
>
> ? ? ? ?* amd64-tdep.c (...):
>
> Except for this small nit with the changelog,
> I have no further issues with this patch.
> Thanks for all your revisions (and your hard work)!
>
> Mark? ?You have the final say...
>
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]