This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
ref: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-11/msg00454.html On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 4:58 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote: > [...] > There are two things this patch does: > 1) properly pop dummy frames more often > 2) make the inferior resumable after an inferior function call gets a > signal without having to remember to do "signal 0" > [...] > Restoring stop_signal also has the benefit that if an inferior function > call is made after getting a signal, and the inferior function call > doesn't complete (e.g. has a breakpoint and doesn't complete right away), > the user can resume the program (after popping the inf fun call off the > stack) with "continue" without having to remember what the signal was > and remember to use "signal N". > [...] Hi. This patch is an update to the testcases for this patch, call-signal-resume.exp now tests for the above case. Comments?
Attachment:
gdb-081125-infcall-tests-1.patch.txt
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |