This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] ia64: Fix breakpoints memory shadow
> > + instr_breakpoint = slotN_contents (bundle_mem, slotnum);
> > + if (instr_breakpoint != IA64_BREAKPOINT)
> > + warning (_("Breakpoint removal cannot find the placed breakpoint at %s"),
> > + paddr_nz (bp_tgt->placed_address));
>
> Can this happen as part of normal GDB behavior? If not, we should
> make this internal_error, I think. If indeed this is a warning, we
> should tell users what to do with such a warning, either as part of
> the message or at least in the manual.
Maybe we can imagine some far-fetched scenario where the user is in
non-stop mode, meaning that the breakpoints are always inserted, and
that the user somehow overwrites the breakpoint instruction manually
before switching back to all-stop (is that even possible?). In that
case, that would be a valid warning.
Regardless of that, I thought that the warning was a judicious choice
because the debugger might be able to recover from this situation.
Whether or not there was a breakpoint there, it can still restore
the instruction at that address and hopefully continue working normally.
Changing the warning into an internal_error would cause the debugger
to abruptly abort the current operation (after which the user might
choose to end the debugging session). I thought that attempting to
recover would bring more benefit in this case.
I would agree that some extra documentation explaining this warning
might be useful. That being said, I'm not opposed to changing the
warning into an internal_error, if you still think it's better.
> > + if (slotnum > 2)
> > + error (_("Can't insert breakpoint for slot numbers greater than 2."));
>
> Similarly here: assuming slot numbers are not something exposed to the
> user, I'd be bewildered if presented with such a message. If this is
> an internal GDB error (a.k.a. bug), let's treat it like one.
In this case, the invalid address can occur as a result of bad user input:
(top-gdb) b *0x4000000000054c73
Breakpoint 4 at 0x4000000000054c73: file gdb.c, line 28.
(top-gdb) c
Continuing.
Can't insert breakpoint for slot numbers greater than 2.
So this is not necessarily an internal error.
I wish GDB would catch the invalid address a little earlier, though.
--
Joel