This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman at br dot ibm dot com>
Cc: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>, teawater <teawater at gmail dot com>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:21:53 -0500
Subject: Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10
References: <daef60380811160021i2bbe6589k1d4d74b66b69a889@mail.gmail.com> <4924C246.6030104@vmware.com> <1227153607.28256.106.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 02:00:07AM -0200, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> I'm fine with leaving 2 to be investigated/addressed when record adds
> support for its 2nd arch. It also may prove impractical, since there may
> be slight differences in syscalls for each arch.

Correct - there are slight differences, e.g. on LP64 platforms, and
especially in the layout of things like 'struct stat' - I don't know
if that's relevant here.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10
  - From: teawater
- Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [RFA] Resubmit process record and replay, 5/10
  - From: Thiago Jung Bauermann

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]