On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:09:01PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Also, I really don't want to pollute the win32-nat.c file with CE
accommodations. That would again make me the de facto maintainer of
Windows CE - a role from which which I've previously abdicated.
So, thanks very much for the patch. It was obviously a lot of work but
I really don't want to do things this way.
I thoroughly agree.
Pedro, if you are motivated to work on this - obviously we'd understand
if you'd rather just use what you've got - I'd be happy to discuss any
improvements to the remote protocol that you needed.