This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
But shouldn't all .c files inculde defs.h first? (Indeed, that's what GDB Internals says.) Which file were you compiling when you got this error? Probably that file should be fixed to include defs.h before frame.h, instead of changing frame.h.
Ugh (excuse my French). If bla.h depends on defs.h, I think it is wrong to ask all c files including bla.h to include defs.h first... But I come from the Ada world, so maybe there is a good reason for this?
I dug a bit further, as my conclusions were a bit premature. Here is one include stack example when this happens:
In file included from breakpoint.h:25, from gdbthread.h:29, from config/nm-lynx.h:49, from nm.h:24, from defs.h:767, from frame.c:23:
I checked frame.c, and it does include defs.h before frame.h. What actually happens is that nm.h is indirectly including frame.h before defs.h has included gdbarch.h... (nm.h = config/i386/nm-i386lynx.h, which is equivalent to config/nm-lynx.h).
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |