This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Sim] Large patch to sim/common/genmloop.sh
- To: Doug Evans <dje at transmeta dot com>
- Subject: Re: [Sim] Large patch to sim/common/genmloop.sh
- From: Ben Elliston <bje at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:16:42 +1100 (EST)
- Cc: <gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com>, <cgen at sources dot redhat dot com>
Except for minimizing the amount of changes, is there any reason to
keep the cpu prefix?
Yes. In some contexts (namely modelling), it makes sense to refer to @cpu@:
#define WANT_CPU_@CPU@
[...]
@cpu@_model_insn_before (current_cpu, first_p);
[etc].
But correct me if I am mistaken.
Ben