This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Ben Elliston writes: > dje wrote: > > What's the reason for this patch again? > > I may (actually, I do!) want to generate two main loops (one per ISA), where > they will share the same CPU name. The @prefix@ notation is also more > general. Except for minimizing the amount of changes, is there any reason to keep the cpu prefix?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |