This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Any downside to using winsymlinks over cygwin-style symlinks?
- From: "" <cygwin at kosowsky dot org>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2019 10:04:51 -0500
- Subject: Any downside to using winsymlinks over cygwin-style symlinks?
Based on the documentation and practical use of the Windows-style
symlinks (winsymlinks) vs Cygwin-style symlinks, it seems to me that:
1. Winsymlinks have the advantage of working as symlinks/shortcuts
under both Cygwin and Windows Explorer while Cygwin links are
recognized only in Cygwin
2. They both are basically text files with some MAGIC numbers and
attributes that allow them to be interpreted as symlinks
So, is there any *disadvantage* to always using Winsymlinks and indeed
converting my old Cygwin-style links to Windows-style?
(Note: I can't use Windows Native symlinks because I don't have admin
privileges on all my machines)
Finally, where is the best place to set CYGWIN=winsymlinks?
In .bash_profile?
Thanks!
Jeff
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple