This is the mail archive of the cygwin-apps mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 7/17/2015 11:50 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 17 10:39, Marco Atzeri wrote:On 7/17/2015 9:32 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Jul 15 16:12, Ken Brown wrote:On 7/15/2015 2:28 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:On Jul 15 16:24, Marco Atzeri wrote:Thanks for looking into this. Two points: - Shall we remove all 32b-bit only orphaned packages for which we don't get a maintainer until, say, end of August?That seems reasonable, as long as there are exceptions for packages where the lack of a 64-bit package is due to genuine porting difficulties. libsigsegv was in that category until yesterday. Another one I'm aware of is ffcall.I understand, but they are unmaintained. So, who's going to check if they are buildable as 64 bit packages?I will look on them, just to complete the effort ;-) But IMHO some should be killed anyway aewm++ ccdoc cramfs mtd ioperm xgraph xsri xview rxvtSounds like a plan. These and all mingw packages.
Jari (the not-maintainer) just uploaded aewm++. I updated the list, accordingly.
as they are well dead upstream, and eventually also nfrotz scsh wtf logiweb for the same reason.As for logiweb, I have still hopes. Yaakov uploaded Klaus' SSH key on 2015-01-27. Unfortunately Klaus never followed up after that, but I just pinged him (and CCed him now).These have surely porting issue ffcall flexdll xwinwm like xemacs and pdftk so they belong to a different categoryOk. Thanks, Corinna
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |