Re: [ITP] ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1

[Corinna Vinschen <corinna-cygwin at cygwin dot com>]

On Mar 31 15:49, marco atzeri wrote:
> On 3/31/2012 12:26 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Mar 30 16:23, marco atzeri wrote:
> >>continuing to reuse the Yaakov efforts, I just removed
> >>some dependency that are not in the distro and modified
> >>the test call.
> >>
> >>
> >>to download (remove the index.html's) :
> >>[....]
> >>ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1-src.tar.bz2
> >>ImageMagick-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
> >>ImageMagick-doc/ImageMagick-doc-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
> >>ImageMagick-doc/setup.hint
> >>libMagick-devel/libMagick-devel-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
> >>libMagick-devel/setup.hint
> >>libMagickCore5/libMagickCore5-6.7.6.2-1.tar.bz2
> >>libMagickCore5/setup.hint
> >
> >I'm a bit puzzled.  Version 6.3.0.1 came with a library package called
> >libMagick10.  6.4.0.6 came with a library called libImageMagick1, and
> >now we get libMagickCore5.
> >
> >Is there some secret scheme behind the changing library names?
> >
> >And, after uploading 6.7.6.2-1, can we remove 6.3.0.1 together with
> >libMagick10, given that it's not used by any package in the distro?
> >
> >
> >Corinna
> >
> 
> for what I see on the source
> 
> MAGICK_LIBRARY_CURRENT=5
> MAGICK_LIBRARY_REVISION=0
> MAGICK_LIBRARY_AGE=0
> 
> so the 5 seems right.

I wasn't talking about the version number, but about the library name
itself:

    libMagick vs. libImageMagick vs. libMagickCore


Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Project Co-Leader          cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat