This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the Cygwin project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: update: tetex 2.0.2-15

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:

> Igor Pechtchanski writes:
> > Well, you could require both (the new XFree86-base is a dummy package,
> Ok, that sounds like an acceptable option.  I've fixed the xorg name
> and added XFree86-base.
> > P.S. Does it really require xorg-x11-base, or xorg-x11-bin-dlls?
> I just mimicked ghostscript-x11.  xorg-x11-bin-dlls will satisfy
> cygcheck, but I guess people who install tetex-x11 want to say xdvi,
> so that should just work.
> Jan.

Hmm, in this particular case it might be a valid choice (you can't run
tetex-x11 without X, can you?).  Some other packages (notably xemacs)
contain way too many dependencies, more than are needed for normal

Note, though, that they would still need to *run* X before xdvi will work.
      |\      _,,,---,,_
ZZZzz /,`.-'`'    -.  ;-;;,_
     |,4-  ) )-,_. ,\ (  `'-'		Igor Pechtchanski, Ph.D.
    '---''(_/--'  `-'\_) fL	a.k.a JaguaR-R-R-r-r-r-.-.-.  Meow!

"Happiness lies in being privileged to work hard for long hours in doing
whatever you think is worth doing."  -- Dr. Jubal Harshaw

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]