This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.

See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more information.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: crosstool status

Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:


Plus I think it's worth getting away from the whole notion of
0.28, which metamorphasized a bit too much during its many months
of existence.



it's not like it makes a difference one way or the other but,
pedantically, calling it 0.28 *does* leapfrog *all* release
candidates, including the unofficial one you referred to earlier.

However, Please let us call it 0.29 (or 1.0).

I don't want to use an "old" version.
And 0.28(whatever) has been around for ages now.
So 0.29 (or 0.9 or 1.0) would just make clear, it's something new(er)!

Just my 0.01 Euro.

--
Steven


------
Want more information?  See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/
Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sources.redhat.com

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]