This is the mail archive of the crossgcc@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the crossgcc project.
See the CrossGCC FAQ for lots more infromation.
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Please remove crossgcc-owner from future email. There is no reason to send your discussion to the owner of the list. Thank you. On Thu, Nov 09, 2000 at 12:05:27PM +0100, Sobhy Gad wrote: >hi again, > >as I allredy said I as-2.95.2 has a BUG. >absolut jumps does not work. only with the verion as-2.9.1 it works >very good. > > .long label_y > jmp label_x > : >label_x: > : >label_y: > >when I compile it with 2.9.1 it works good. any other verion does NOT >work. >this is the result of as-2.95.2 for jmp label_x is: >41F9 0000 0000. >as you see >> 0000 0000 << should be a distence to the label >it does not calculate the jump. >the same with .long label_y is tranlated as 0000 0000 >insted of the addresse of label_y. >but when you load the label to an addresse register let us say a0 and >then > >jump (a0) > >it works. > >STRANGE, is'nt it ????????? >I think there is a bug with the absolute JUMPS. > >best regards >S. Gad ------ Want more information? See the CrossGCC FAQ, http://www.objsw.com/CrossGCC/ Want to unsubscribe? Send a note to crossgcc-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
| Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
|---|---|---|
| Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |