Re: linux test results for the 2.33 branch

[Matthias Klose <doko at ubuntu dot com>]

On 18.09.19 20:19, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 6:25 AM Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > These are test results for various linux targets from the trunk 20190909, which
> > should be identical to the start of the 2.33 branch. Built using GCC 9, running
> > with glibc-2.29.
> >
> > Complete build logs at
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=binutils
> >
> > No failures on amd64, hppa, ppc64el,
> >
> > arm64:
> > Version /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/builddir-single/binutils/objdump 2.32.51.20190909
> > FAIL: objdump -S
> > FAIL: objdump --source-comment
> >
> > Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-aarch64/aarch64-elf.exp ...
> > FAIL: ld-aarch64/tls-relax-gdesc-le-now
> > FAIL: Check -z force-bti emits BTI PLT (shared)
> > FAIL: ld-aarch64/pac-plt-1
> > FAIL: ld-aarch64/pac-plt-2
> > FAIL: ld-aarch64/bti-pac-plt-1
> >
> > armel, armhf:
> > Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/tls.exp ...
> > FAIL: Build pr22263-1
> >
> > i686:
> > Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp ...
> > FAIL: Build property 1
> > FAIL: Build property 1 (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 1 (.so)
> > FAIL: Build property 2
> > FAIL: Build property 2 (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 2 (.so)
> > FAIL: Build property 3
> > FAIL: Build property 3 (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 3 (.so)
> > FAIL: Build property 4
> > FAIL: Build property 4 (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 4 (.so)
> > FAIL: Build property 4 (-Wl,-z,stack-size=0)
> > FAIL: Build property 5
> > FAIL: Build property 5 (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 5 (.so)
> > FAIL: Build property-6.so
> > FAIL: Build property-6.o
> > FAIL: Build property-6
> > FAIL: Build property 7a (.o)
> > FAIL: Build property 7b (.o)
>
> I am backporting:
>
> commit 6715fe29ffcdbef026908fed62e993b238d04d77
> Author: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
> Date:   Mon Sep 9 09:21:36 2019 -0700
>
>      i386: Adjust for new output format from readelf

Thanks

> > FAIL: Run pr19031
> > FAIL: Run got1
> > FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -no-pie)
> > FAIL: Undefined weak symbol (-fPIE -pie)
>
> I didn't see them.

I see these on Ubuntu as well:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/443033852/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-i386.binutils_2.32.90.20190917-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz

Both gcc-9 builds are configured to default to PIE by default.

Matthias