This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: linux test results for the 2.33 branch


On 19.09.19 08:40, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 03:25:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
powerpc, ppc64:
Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-gc/gc.exp ...
FAIL: Check --gc-section
FAIL: Check --gc-section/-q
FAIL: Check --gc-section/-r/-e
FAIL: Check --gc-section/-r/-u

This should pass on powerpc.  It does for me using a current gcc-9
powerpc-linux compiler.  Does your powerpc-linux compiler default to
-m64?

These are the Debian release architectures, which are no Debian release architectures anymore. powerpc translates to powerpc-linux-gnu (defaulting to -m32), and ppc64 to powerpc64-linux-gnu (defaulting to -m64).

On powerpc64 these tests are xfailed.  Ubuntu edits to ld-gc/gc.exp?

No edits. And Ubuntu doesn't have powerpc anymore (and never had ppc64).

if [istarget powerpc64*-*-*] {
     # otherwise with -mcmodel=medium gcc we get XPASSes.
     set cflags "$cflags -mminimal-toc"
}
...
     #ppc64_elf_gc_mark_hook needs to be taught how to look through
     #the .toc section to properly mark variable sections for gc.
     setup_xfail "powerpc64*-*-*"

On Ubuntu powerpc64le-linux-gnu I see one failure:

Running /<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/ld/testsuite/ld-plugin/lto.exp ...
FAIL: Run pr24406-1

Full build log at
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/443029281/buildlog_ubuntu-eoan-ppc64el.binutils_2.32.90.20190917-0ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz

The difference to Debian is glibc 2.30 instead of 2.29.

Matthias


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]