Re: Testsuite regressions for arm, h8300 (was: Consolidate run_dump_test)

[Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com>]

On Sun, Sep 16, 2018 at 12:37:35AM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2018 17:03:30 +0930
> > From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
> 
> > This merges the three versions of run_dump_test.  Improved warning
> > handling versus the old gas version shows up a number of tests
> 
> I (or my autotester) noticed regressions for arm-unknown-eabi.
> I tweaked the subject to catch the eye of any supposed
> maintainer on duty.
> 
> > that
> > need their disassembly updating:
> 
> Do you intend to do that, or do you leave it to a target
> maintainer?  (I'd do it if my "arm-fu" was stronger.)

I'd like a target maintainer to look at it.  If I were updating the
testcases I'd just assume the current output is good and blindly copy
that to the file.  (Which is often what happens anyway, but there's
some chance an ARM maintainer might do a little more checking!)

> > arm-linuxeabi  +FAIL: ARM v1 instructions
> > arm-linuxeabi  +FAIL: Accepted v8-a with ARMv8.1 AdvSIMD.
> > arm-linuxeabi  +FAIL: bl local instructions for v4t.
> > arm-linuxeabi  +FAIL: UDF
> > and some that now fail due to detecting assembly warnings:
> > h8300-elf  +FAIL: binutils-all/strip-13
> > h8300-elf  +FAIL: binutils-all/strip-14
> > h8300-elf  +FAIL: binutils-all/strip-15
> > 
> > I've generally kept the union of all run_dump_test features, except
> > that the ld target aliases "cfi" and "shared" have disappeared, as has
> > the binutils substitution of $srcdir as $scrdir/$subdir.
> 
> Nice consolidation, anyway; there's always fall-out.
> 
> brgds, H-P

-- 
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM