This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix "REP RET" with -madd-bnd-prefix
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at suse dot com>
- Cc: Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 05:35:09 -0700
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: fix "REP RET" with -madd-bnd-prefix
- References: <5B0E558202000078001C6D83@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:40 AM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> Just like any other branches, RET should gain a BND prefix also when
> already prefixed in source by REP.7
>
> gas/
> 2018-05-30 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> * config/tc-i386.c (md_assemble): Also replace an already
> present REP prefix.
> * testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s,
> testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s: Test RET with
> all REP flavors.
> * testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d,
> testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d: Adjust
> expectations.
>
> --- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> +++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
> @@ -4110,10 +4110,13 @@ md_assemble (char *line)
> }
>
> /* Insert BND prefix. */
> - if (add_bnd_prefix
> - && i.tm.opcode_modifier.bndprefixok
> - && !i.prefix[BND_PREFIX])
> - add_prefix (BND_PREFIX_OPCODE);
> + if (add_bnd_prefix && i.tm.opcode_modifier.bndprefixok)
> + {
> + if (!i.prefix[BND_PREFIX])
> + add_prefix (BND_PREFIX_OPCODE);
> + else
> + i.prefix[BND_PREFIX] = BND_PREFIX_OPCODE;
> + }
>
> /* Check string instruction segment overrides. */
> if (i.tm.opcode_modifier.isstring && i.mem_operands != 0)
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
> 0+14 <foo>:
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd ret
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd ret
> -[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 e8 f6 ff ff ff bnd call 14 <foo>
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd ret
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd ret
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 e8 f2 ff ff ff bnd call 14 <foo>
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 01 c3 add %eax,%ebx
> -[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 f2 loop 14 <foo>
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 ee loop 14 <foo>
> #pass
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s
> @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
> jmp *(%ebx)
> ret
> foo:
> - # Use of REPNE prefix - we shouldn't get any error
> + # Use of any REP prefix - we shouldn't get any error
> + rep ret
> + repe ret
> repne ret
> # BND prefix already exists - we shouldn't get any error here
> bnd ret
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.d
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@ Disassembly of section .text:
> 0+14 <foo>:
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd retq
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd retq
> -[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 e8 f6 ff ff ff bnd callq 14 <foo>
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd retq
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 c3 bnd retq
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: f2 e8 f2 ff ff ff bnd callq 14 <foo>
> [ ]*[a-f0-9]+: 48 01 c3 add %rax,%rbx
> -[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 f1 loop 14 <foo>
> +[ ]*[a-f0-9]+: e2 ed loop 14 <foo>
> #pass
> --- a/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s
> +++ b/gas/testsuite/gas/i386/x86-64-mpx-add-bnd-prefix.s
> @@ -8,7 +8,9 @@
> jmp *(%rbx)
> ret
> foo:
> - # Use of REPNE prefix - we shouldn't get any error
> + # Use of any REP prefix - we shouldn't get any error
> + rep ret
> + repe ret
> repne ret
> # BND prefix already exists - we shouldn't get any error here
> bnd ret
>
Assembly code asks for F3 prefix and F2 prefix is generated.
It does't look right to me.
--
H.J.