This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] dwarf.c handle new DWARFv5 C11, C++11 and C++14 DW_LANG constants.

From: Jeff Law <law at redhat dot com>
To: Sebastian Huber <sebastian dot huber at embedded-brains dot de>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 14:19:22 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dwarf.c handle new DWARFv5 C11, C++11 and C++14 DW_LANG constants.
Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
References: <1416860956-29285-1-git-send-email-mjw at redhat dot com> <1417019098 dot 4954 dot 29 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <54773EBE dot 1010106 at embedded-brains dot de> <1417101289 dot 4954 dot 46 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <5478568A dot 8070903 at embedded-brains dot de> <1417173558 dot 4954 dot 50 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <5478648F dot 7020604 at embedded-brains dot de> <1417450577 dot 4954 dot 75 dot camel at bordewijk dot wildebeest dot org> <54800BB0 dot 8080204 at embedded-brains dot de> <20141204113456 dot GA20383 at bubble dot grove dot modra dot org> <548E9143 dot 2070105 at embedded-brains dot de>

On 12/15/14 00:44, Sebastian Huber wrote:


On 04/12/14 12:34, Alan Modra wrote:

On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 08:22:24AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:

>
>On 01/12/14 17:16, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> >On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 13:03 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:

> >>>On 28/11/14 12:19, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> >>>> >On Fri, 2014-11-28 at 12:03 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:

> >>>>> >>On 27/11/14 16:14, Mark Wielaard wrote:

> >>>>>> >>>On Thu, 2014-11-27 at 16:09 +0100, Sebastian
Huber wrote:

> >>>>>>>> >>>>>Out of curiosity why is this "ANSI C11"
and not simply "C11" (like
> >>>>>>>> >>>>>"C++11") or "ISO C11"?

> >>>>>> >>>No particular reason, except to be consistent
with the existing naming
> >>>>>> >>>used. DW_LANG_C89 was already "ANSI C" and
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus was
> >>>>>> >>>already "C++".

> >>>>> >>As far as I know there is no ANSI C11, the standard
is ISO/IEC 9899:2011.

> >>>> >What is you recommendation then? Currently we have
DW_LANG_C89/"ANSI C",
> >>>> >DW_LANG_C/"non-ANSI C", DW_LANG_C99/"ANSI C99" and
DW_LANG_C11/"ANSI
> >>>> >C11".

> >>>
> >>>I would simply use "C11".

> >OK. Patch attached.

>
>Thanks for the patch.  Are there any objections to apply it?

Please commit.


Sorry, I don't have write access.

Let's fix that :-)

https://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/pdw/ps_form.cgi

List me as approving your request.

Jeff

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]