Re: RFC: Support link with mixed IR/non-IR objects

[Andi Kleen <ak at linux dot intel dot com>]

> - -ffunction-sections code may be reorganized, losing cache locality.
>    eg. two different files each with a static "setup" function will
>    have those functions placed together in the same section.

Kernel doesn't use this.
> - Combining sections prevents --gc-sections from working as well as it
>    could.
Obsolete with LTO

> - On targets like powerpc64, ld -r may cause overflow of the .toc
>    section in the resulting relocatable object file.  If the files were
>    left separate, the final ld could cope by generating multiple .toc
>    sections.

Is that a real problem for the kernel?

As far as I can tell the only real problem is the LTO issue and HJ solved
that.

Your arguments are not persuasive, especially given the complexity of 
the kernel
build system.

If HJs patchkit is not merged I just have to advise people to use his 
toolchain
for LTO kernel builds instead. That would be unfortunate.

-Andi