This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 2.22.1 Possible -> Yes!

On Apr 27, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Alan Modra wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
>> One more word about binutils release:  I think it is not as important as it was in the past.  Many (> 99% maybe) of binutils users use Fedora/Suse/RH/XXX versions of binutils, which follow a second release process.
> 
> Yes, and the funny thing about that is that I get to backport to Suse
> and RedHat as I just said in another email.  So they stay on an older
> binutils release for stablity, but their powerpc backends look
> surprisingly like mainline binutils!

Indeed.  This confirms that binutils is stable.

Tristan.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]